From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:04:23 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <20020711175558.5C33.LEKTU@terra.es> References: <20020711162739.5C2B.LEKTU@terra.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026403569 2415 127.0.0.1 (11 Jul 2002 16:06:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 16:06:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm), rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17SgSG-0000cq-00 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:06:08 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17Sgbj-0005sm-00 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:15:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17SgSs-00063C-00; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:06:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.22.27.141] (helo=mail.peoplecall.com) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17SgQh-0005oB-00; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:04:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.22.27.143] (jbarranquero.ofi.peoplecall.com [62.22.27.143]) by mail.peoplecall.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6BG4MM28267; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:04:23 +0200 Original-To: Andreas Schwab In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.05 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5662 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5662 On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:48:01 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > It is also an index into the specpdl array. Well, yeah, you're right. This is C we're talking 'bout, after all :) Anyway, the switch to SPECPDL_INDEX is now done. Changing the variables (count, speccount, speccount1, post_read_count, count1 and specpdl_count) to use a single name seems sensible. I'll do it a bit at a time. I'll use specpdl_top, if no one opposes it. /L/e/k/t/u