From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:55:14 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200207111655.g6BGtEK03167@rum.cs.yale.edu>
References: <20020711150740.5C22.LEKTU@terra.es> <5xsn2qpbh9.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk>  <20020711162739.5C2B.LEKTU@terra.es>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026410936 22590 127.0.0.1 (11 Jul 2002 18:08:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:08:56 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: no-spam@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm), storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm), rms@gnu.org,
   emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17SiN5-0005sF-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 20:08:55 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17SiWb-0000Fw-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 20:18:45 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17SiNm-0001Ol-00; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:09:38 -0400
Original-Received: from delysid.gnu.org ([158.121.106.20])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17SiKr-0000XD-00; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:06:37 -0400
Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169])
	by delysid.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #2)
	id 17ShDo-00054C-00; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:55:16 -0400
Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost)
	by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g6BGtEK03167;
	Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:55:14 -0400
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4
Original-To: Juanma Barranquero <lektu@terra.es>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5666
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5666

> On 11 Jul 2002 16:48:02 +0200, no-spam@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) wrote:
> 
> > Less cryptic that specpdl_index?  :-)
> 
> Well, er... yeah, I suppose... more or less. :-)
> 
> > Actually, `specpdl_index' isn't really good either, as it is not the
> > current index, but the saved index.
> 
> Hm. I've blindly made the change, but now I have second thoughts.

Could people refrain from making such "gratuitous" pervasive changes ?
It's a pain in the ass to maintain local uncommitted changes when
you guys do that.


	Stefan