From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 15:08:38 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <20020711150740.5C22.LEKTU@terra.es> References: <20020710104625.D772.LEKTU@terra.es> <5x3cuqqtru.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026392914 3215 127.0.0.1 (11 Jul 2002 13:08:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:08:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17SdgQ-0000pk-00 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 15:08:34 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17Sdpp-0001nw-00 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 15:18:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17Sdh2-0006Ii-00; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:09:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.22.27.141] (helo=mail.peoplecall.com) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17Sdgf-0006Hz-00; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:08:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.22.27.143] (jbarranquero.ofi.peoplecall.com [62.22.27.143]) by mail.peoplecall.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6BD8cM26333; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 15:08:38 +0200 Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-Reply-To: <5x3cuqqtru.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.05 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5650 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5650 On 11 Jul 2002 15:27:33 +0200, storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) wrote: > For consistency, I suggest to change all occurrences of `specpdl_ptr - > specpdl' to SPECPDL_INDEX. OK, I'll take care of it. > I'd suggest changing the name of those variables to `specpdl_index' or > just `spix' (which isn't currently used anywhere) for short. "spix" seems a bit cryptic to me. /L/e/k/t/u