From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: reducing defface redundancy
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:20:47 -0600 (MDT)
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200207101920.g6AJKlO15763@aztec.santafe.edu>
References: <877kn3qczq.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> <rj4ri62weq.fsf@zuse.dina.kvl.dk> <871yd9q09b.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> <200204220747.g3M7lo301995@aztec.santafe.edu> <buo7kn09mka.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp> <200204230024.g3N0OH702333@aztec.santafe.edu> <buohem3mc0c.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp> <200204241754.g3OHsIm03235@aztec.santafe.edu> <buo3cv1b9jg.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp> <200207081820.g68IKkT12950@aztec.santafe.edu> <buohej9bsku.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>  <200207091851.g69IpWe13865@aztec.santafe.edu> <200207092052.g69KqKm28754@rum.cs.yale.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026328845 13388 127.0.0.1 (10 Jul 2002 19:20:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:20:45 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: miles@gnu.org, abraham@dina.kvl.dk, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17SN13-0003To-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:20:45 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17SNA6-0002rf-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:30:06 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17SN1h-0007e1-00; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:21:25 -0400
Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17SN17-0007bt-00; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:20:49 -0400
Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49])
	by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6AJKlB00048;
	Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:20:47 -0600 (MDT)
Original-Received: (from rms@localhost)
	by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g6AJKlO15763;
	Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:20:47 -0600 (MDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f
Original-To: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu
In-Reply-To: <200207092052.g69KqKm28754@rum.cs.yale.edu>
	(monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5636
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5636

If we have buffer-specific face attributes, or buffer-specific face
redirections, you could use them to give the minibuffer different
faces.  Do you ever create a minibuffer window that is part of a
larger frame?  If you do, would you be unhappy if the special face
definitions that you use for the minibuffer were effective there too?