From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jon Cast Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: No calc in pretest? Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 22:22:34 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200207090322.g693MYo04082@d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026185020 18363 127.0.0.1 (9 Jul 2002 03:23:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 03:23:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: pot@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, burton@openprivacy.org, eliz@is.elta.co.il, storm@cua.dk, miles@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17RlbI-0004m4-00 for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 05:23:40 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17RljX-0007QN-00 for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 05:32:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17Rlam-0004uj-00; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 23:23:08 -0400 Original-Received: from d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu ([129.15.78.125]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17RlZv-0004pT-00; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 23:22:15 -0400 Original-Received: from ou.edu (jcast@localhost) by d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g693MYo04082; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 22:22:34 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu: jcast owned process doing -bs Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Message from Richard Stallman of "Sat, 06 Jul 2002 17:31:41 MDT." <200207062331.g66NVfq10506@aztec.santafe.edu> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5588 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5588 Richard Stallman wrote: > I think he means numbering bug-fix releases as > 21.x.{2,3,...}. The bug-fix number is the `minor-minor' > number. > We could do this starting with the next non-bug-fix release. I think this is a good idea, and I volunteer (again) to do any changes to the code which may be required to support the new scheme. Jon Cast