From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [patch] XPM in gamegrid.el
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 04:01:26 -0600 (MDT)
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200207061001.g66A1Qs09615@aztec.santafe.edu>
References: <m3znxb5yz1.fsf@ID-87814.user.dfncis.de>
	<200207021946.g62Jkd802100@aztec.santafe.edu>
	<m3znx9bqin.fsf@ID-87814.user.dfncis.de>
	<200207041824.g64IO3906414@aztec.santafe.edu>
	<200207041910.g64JApB31201@rum.cs.yale.edu> <rjd6u2igo8.fsf@zuse.dina.kvl.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026132841 5512 127.0.0.1 (8 Jul 2002 12:54:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 12:54:01 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17RY1g-0001Qn-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 14:54:00 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17RY9d-0004PP-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 15:02:13 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17RY23-0004jW-00; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 08:54:23 -0400
Original-Received: from delysid.gnu.org ([158.121.106.20])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17RXKi-0008Kr-00; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 08:09:36 -0400
Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119])
	by delysid.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #2)
	id 17Qmc7-0001vL-00; Sat, 06 Jul 2002 06:16:27 -0400
Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49])
	by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g66A1UV26588;
	Sat, 6 Jul 2002 04:01:30 -0600 (MDT)
Original-Received: (from rms@localhost)
	by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g66A1Qs09615;
	Sat, 6 Jul 2002 04:01:26 -0600 (MDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f
Original-To: abraham@dina.kvl.dk
In-Reply-To: <rjd6u2igo8.fsf@zuse.dina.kvl.dk> (message from Per Abrahamsen on
	Fri, 05 Jul 2002 12:59:35 +0200)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5564
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5564

    If one frame use a dark background, and another use a a light
    background.

The background is specified by the definition of the face `default'.
So this application for frame-local face definitions would only arise
if people use frame-local definitions for `default'.

    If the frames are one different screens, maybe even one being a
    termcap frame and the other an X11 frame.

Right now this is not implemented, but we want to support it.  I guess
that means we do need to support frame-local face definitions.