From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Jon Cast <jcast@ou.edu>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: No calc in pretest?
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 18:14:18 -0500
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200207052314.g65NEI829912@d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu>
References: <rms@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025910908 16744 127.0.0.1 (5 Jul 2002 23:15:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 23:15:08 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: miles@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk, pot@gnu.org, eliz@is.elta.co.il,
   burton@openprivacy.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17QcI8-0004Lx-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Sat, 06 Jul 2002 01:15:08 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17QcOp-0004TY-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sat, 06 Jul 2002 01:22:03 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17QcIH-00076v-00; Fri, 05 Jul 2002 19:15:17 -0400
Original-Received: from d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu ([129.15.78.125])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17QcHc-00073N-00; Fri, 05 Jul 2002 19:14:36 -0400
Original-Received: from ou.edu (jcast@localhost)
	by d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g65NEI829912;
	Fri, 5 Jul 2002 18:14:18 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu: jcast owned process doing -bs
Original-To: rms@gnu.org
In-Reply-To: Message from Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
   of "Fri, 05 Jul 2002 16:07:46 MDT." <200207052207.g65M7kD08785@aztec.santafe.edu>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5540
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5540

Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:
>     Since the code changes to use minor-minor numbers appear to be
>     (heh) minor, what's the problem with using them?

> Sorry, I don't understand which proposal you are asking about.

I think he means numbering bug-fix releases as 21.x.{2,3,...}.  The
bug-fix number is the `minor-minor' number.

Jon Cast