From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: No calc in pretest?
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 16:07:46 -0600 (MDT)
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200207052207.g65M7kD08785@aztec.santafe.edu>
References: <200207032135.g63LZOw22583@d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu>
	<8765zwii4h.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp>
	<200207041824.g64IOBF06432@aztec.santafe.edu> <buovg7vas3a.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025906947 11147 127.0.0.1 (5 Jul 2002 22:09:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 22:09:07 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: jcast@ou.edu, storm@cua.dk, pot@gnu.org, eliz@is.elta.co.il,
   burton@openprivacy.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17QbGE-0002tg-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Sat, 06 Jul 2002 00:09:06 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17QbMu-000300-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sat, 06 Jul 2002 00:16:00 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17QbGj-0000B8-00; Fri, 05 Jul 2002 18:09:37 -0400
Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17QbEx-0008ST-00; Fri, 05 Jul 2002 18:07:47 -0400
Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49])
	by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g65M7oV14776;
	Fri, 5 Jul 2002 16:07:50 -0600 (MDT)
Original-Received: (from rms@localhost)
	by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g65M7kD08785;
	Fri, 5 Jul 2002 16:07:46 -0600 (MDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f
Original-To: miles@gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <buovg7vas3a.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp> (message from Miles
	Bader on 05 Jul 2002 10:20:09 +0900)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5531
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5531

    Since the code changes to use minor-minor numbers appear to be (heh)
    minor, what's the problem with using them?

Sorry, I don't understand which proposal you are asking about.