From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Stoeber Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: go to next unsaved buffer Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 20:02:35 +0000 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <20020704200235.GA8913@xyz> References: <87y9cuzgzt.fsf@jidanni.org> <20020702103800.GA179@xyz> <87sn311iqf.fsf@jidanni.org> <20020703121653.GA179@xyz> <200207041824.g64IOXw06480@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025812961 26864 127.0.0.1 (4 Jul 2002 20:02:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 20:02:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jidanni@dman.ddts.net Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17QCoK-0006zA-00 for ; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 22:02:40 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17QCuT-0001CY-00 for ; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 22:09:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17QCol-0000FY-00; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 16:03:07 -0400 Original-Received: from manelan061.rz.tu-ilmenau.de ([141.24.132.61] helo=xyz) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17QCoY-0000FC-00 for ; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 16:02:54 -0400 Original-Received: from q by xyz with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17QCoF-0003Pl-00; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 20:02:35 +0000 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200207041824.g64IOXw06480@aztec.santafe.edu> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5486 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5486 On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 12:24:33PM -0600, Richard Stallman wrote: > switch-to-next-unsaved-buffer seems like a useful function. > I don't think we can afford to give it a global key binding, though. Default key bindings are irrelevant anyway, once the user learns .emacs and global-set-key (cf. the C-x C-q discussion :-) > The name is rather long; I think switch-to-unsaved-buffer > would be better. No problem. defalias is our friend. [Hmm, wouldn't it be nice to have software where _all_ debates are pointless by design?]