From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ehelp woes, or why I hate a module that I love so much Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 15:31:37 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <20020704153004.4CBE.LEKTU@terra.es> References: <20020704135240.4CBB.LEKTU@terra.es> <87fzyzhehh.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025791391 19762 127.0.0.1 (4 Jul 2002 14:03:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 14:03:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Simon Josefsson , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17Q7CR-00058d-00 for ; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 16:03:11 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17Q7IS-0001Tf-00 for ; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 16:09:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17Q6s8-0004YZ-00; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 09:42:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.22.27.141] (helo=mail.peoplecall.com) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17Q6hv-0003bJ-00; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 09:31:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.22.27.143] (jbarranquero.ofi.peoplecall.com [62.22.27.143] (may be forged)) by mail.peoplecall.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g64DVbe11326; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 15:31:37 +0200 Original-To: Miles Bader In-Reply-To: <87fzyzhehh.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.05 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5457 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5457 On 04 Jul 2002 21:19:54 +0900, Miles Bader wrote: > I suspect the biggest effort will be > in making various lisp applications thread-safe, not in the low-level (C > level) thread support, so it will be incurred regardless of how threads > are added. Yes, sure. So Guile looks even less of a necessity. /L/e/k/t/u