From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: No calc in pretest? Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 08:08:40 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <20020704080501.4CAF.LEKTU@terra.es> References: <200207022038.g62KcQs19292@d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025762945 5365 127.0.0.1 (4 Jul 2002 06:09:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 06:09:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Jon Cast , storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm), Emacs Devel Mailing List Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17Pznd-0001OQ-00 for ; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 08:09:05 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17PztV-0007ep-00 for ; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 08:15:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17Pznm-0004Ec-00; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 02:09:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.22.27.141] (helo=mail.peoplecall.com) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17PznG-0004CR-00; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 02:08:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.22.27.143] (jbarranquero.ofi.peoplecall.com [62.22.27.143] (may be forged)) by mail.peoplecall.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6468de15647; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 08:08:39 +0200 Original-To: Jason Rumney In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.05 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5439 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5439 On 02 Jul 2002 22:46:36 +0100, Jason Rumney wrote: > Even better, test for features, not for version numbers. Sure, but what when you need to detect a change in some interface? (For example, that a function now admits a few more arguments). There's no feature there. Sometimes you just need to know the release, or do fancy tricks like (require 'cl) (unless (ignore-errors (whatever-func 1 2 3) t) (whatever-func 1 2)) /L/e/k/t/u