From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: No calc in pretest?
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 14:57:14 -0600 (MDT)
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200207032057.g63KvEd04679@aztec.santafe.edu>
References: <200206300644.g5U6irvR010148@adams0-57.reshall.ou.edu>
	<87pty7t9q6.fsf@pot.cnuce.cnr.it> <5xit3ypl9d.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk>
	<buod6u6sges.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp> <5x8z4upiqs.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025732378 28320 127.0.0.1 (3 Jul 2002 21:39:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 21:39:38 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: miles@gnu.org, pot@gnu.org, jcast@ou.edu, eliz@is.elta.co.il,
   burton@openprivacy.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17Prqc-0007Mf-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 23:39:38 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17PrwI-0004Wl-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 23:45:31 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17PrEZ-0006QR-00; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 17:00:19 -0400
Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17PrBd-00060F-00; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 16:57:17 -0400
Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49])
	by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g63KvIV07343;
	Wed, 3 Jul 2002 14:57:18 -0600 (MDT)
Original-Received: (from rms@localhost)
	by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g63KvEd04679;
	Wed, 3 Jul 2002 14:57:14 -0600 (MDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f
Original-To: storm@cua.dk
In-Reply-To: <5x8z4upiqs.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5425
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5425

    It uses high-numbered "minor-minor" numbers (which I think is a good
    idea), but the "minor" number of the pretest is plain wrong!

It would perhaps be logical to use negative minor-minor version numbers.
I wonder if that would break anything.  We could try it.