From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Juanma Barranquero <lektu@terra.es>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: No calc in pretest?
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2002 09:58:59 +0200
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <20020703095715.8A77.LEKTU@terra.es>
References: <20020702233510.6B87.LEKTU@terra.es> <200207030052.g630qVv20313@d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025683211 18104 127.0.0.1 (3 Jul 2002 08:00:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 08:00:11 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm), Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>,
   Francesco Potorti` <pot@gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>,
   burton@openprivacy.org, Emacs Devel Mailing List <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17Pf3a-0004hl-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 10:00:10 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17Pf90-0002pn-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 10:05:46 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17Pf3b-0006Xi-00; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 04:00:11 -0400
Original-Received: from [62.22.27.141] (helo=mail.peoplecall.com)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17Pf2g-0006TV-00; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 03:59:14 -0400
Original-Received: from [62.22.27.143] (jbarranquero.ofi.peoplecall.com [62.22.27.143])
	by mail.peoplecall.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g637wwe11301;
	Wed, 3 Jul 2002 09:58:58 +0200
Original-To: Jon Cast <jcast@ou.edu>
In-Reply-To: <200207030052.g630qVv20313@d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu>
X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.05
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5391
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5391

On Tue, 02 Jul 2002 19:52:31 -0500, Jon Cast <jcast@ou.edu> wrote:

> I think my change (only changing to 21.3.50/21.3.0.50 when 21.2/21.2.1
> is released from CVS head) should fix that.  Do you agree, in theory?

Yes.

> I somewhat agree about the ``visually distinctive'' bit.  I will
> insist on distinguishing 21.1.0.50 (CVS) from 21.1.0.90 (Pre-test)
> until somebody corrects me, though.

Fair enough.

> The thought had crossed my mind, but I didn't want to get into that.

I'm not trying to start a flamewar either :)


                                                           /L/e/k/t/u