From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jon Cast Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: No calc in pretest? Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 19:52:31 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200207030052.g630qVv20313@d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025657622 15990 127.0.0.1 (3 Jul 2002 00:53:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 00:53:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm), Miles Bader , Francesco Potorti` , Eli Zaretskii , burton@openprivacy.org, Emacs Devel Mailing List Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17PYOs-00049n-00 for ; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 02:53:42 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17PYU8-0001ht-00 for ; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 02:59:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17PYPD-0004pz-00; Tue, 02 Jul 2002 20:54:03 -0400 Original-Received: from d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu ([129.15.78.125]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17PYNy-0004cm-00; Tue, 02 Jul 2002 20:52:46 -0400 Original-Received: from ou.edu (jcast@localhost) by d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g630qVv20313; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 19:52:31 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu: jcast owned process doing -bs Original-To: Juanma Barranquero In-Reply-To: Message from Juanma Barranquero of "Tue, 02 Jul 2002 23:44:58 -0300." <20020702233510.6B87.LEKTU@terra.es> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5381 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5381 > On Tue, 02 Jul 2002 15:44:59 -0500 > Jon Cast wrote: > > You said you use (lk-check-version 21 2 50). So your code doesn't > > break because 21.x's pre-test has version number 21.(x-1).90, > > right? > No, it breaks when 21.2.50 suddenly becomes 21.3.50 ;-) I think my change (only changing to 21.3.50/21.3.0.50 when 21.2/21.2.1 is released from CVS head) should fix that. Do you agree, in theory? > > I agree, all though I'd personally prefer 22.x to be the Gnome > > integration release :) > Even better, the Gnome Integration / Full Unicode Support release :) Either way :) > Jokes aside, I agree with whomever (I think it was you) proposed a > scheme like: > 21.1.1 From HEAD > 21.1.2 1st bugfix release > 21.1.3 2nd " " > etc. > 21.2.1 From HEAD > 21.2.2 1st bugfix release > etc. > 22.1.1 From HEAD (new major release) > and 21.2.1.YYYYMMDD or 21.1.50, etc for pretests (I favor the > YYYYMMDD format because it is visually distinctive). I somewhat agree about the ``visually distinctive'' bit. I will insist on distinguishing 21.1.0.50 (CVS) from 21.1.0.90 (Pre-test) until somebody corrects me, though. > No offense intended, but jumping to 22.X, 23.X, etc too fast would > make me feel like we're on a race against XEmacs ;-) The thought had crossed my mind, but I didn't want to get into that. > -- > Juanma Barranquero Jon Cast