From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jon Cast Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: No calc in pretest? Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 19:45:53 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200207030045.g630jsY20291@d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu> References: <5xvg7xd9vk.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025657260 15518 127.0.0.1 (3 Jul 2002 00:47:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 00:47:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Francesco Potorti` , Eli Zaretskii , burton@openprivacy.org, Emacs Devel Mailing List Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17PYJ2-00042B-00 for ; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 02:47:40 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17PYOJ-0001WC-00 for ; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 02:53:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17PYJP-0004H2-00; Tue, 02 Jul 2002 20:48:03 -0400 Original-Received: from d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu ([129.15.78.125]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17PYHX-0004GF-00; Tue, 02 Jul 2002 20:46:07 -0400 Original-Received: from ou.edu (jcast@localhost) by d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g630jsY20291; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 19:45:54 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu: jcast owned process doing -bs Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-Reply-To: Message from storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) of "Wed, 03 Jul 2002 00:48:31 +0200." <5xvg7xd9vk.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5380 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5380 storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) wrote: > Jon Cast writes: > > 21.5.0.yyyymmdd sorts higher than 21.5.0, so it should be a later > > release. > Then call the initial release 21.5.1. You mean like this? 21.5.0.50.yyyymmdd -- CVS leading up to 21.5.1 21.5.0.9x. -- Pre-test for 21.5.1 21.5.1 -- Release from CVS head 21.5.x -- Bug-fix release (x > 1) I *think* that should satisfy both of us. I'm happy with it; how about you? The reason for having separate version numbers for CVS (x.y.0.50.yyyymmdd and x.y.0.9z) is that I think emacsbug.el needs to be able to differentiate them, and that seems easiest to implement (not to mention most similar to other GNU programs). I'm not really attached to it outside of those two reasons, and I'm not at all attached to x.y.0.9z vs. x.y.0.90.yyyymmdd. The date just seems less necessary for pre-tests, since they change less often. The visual tagging it provides could justify it, though. > -- > Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk Jon Cast