From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Jon Cast <jcast@ou.edu>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: No calc in pretest?
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 19:33:35 -0500
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200207030033.g630XZM20263@d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu>
References: <bob@rattlesnake.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025656559 14569 127.0.0.1 (3 Jul 2002 00:35:59 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 00:35:59 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17PY7i-0003mr-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 02:35:58 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17PYCz-0001IE-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 02:41:25 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17PY7t-0002Nt-00; Tue, 02 Jul 2002 20:36:09 -0400
Original-Received: from d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu ([129.15.78.125])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17PY5d-00028F-00
	for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Tue, 02 Jul 2002 20:33:50 -0400
Original-Received: from ou.edu (jcast@localhost)
	by d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g630XZM20263;
	Tue, 2 Jul 2002 19:33:35 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu: jcast owned process doing -bs
Original-To: bob@rattlesnake.com
In-Reply-To: Message from "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@rattlesnake.com>
   of "Tue, 02 Jul 2002 21:30:55 -0000." <m17PVEd-000Ij6C@localhost>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5379
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5379

Robert J. Chassell" <bob@rattlesnake.com> wrote:
<snip>
> The change that seems to have caused all this discussion is the idea
> of having two tracks, a `bug-fix' track, and a `new-features' track.
> In the past, there was only one track, which included both bug fixes
> and new features.

There /are/ two tracks already.  The problem is, they're interleaved,
so you can't tell which track a particular release is on.  The
discussion is simply looking for a way to dis-entangle the tracks.

> --
>     Robert J. Chassell                  bob@rattlesnake.com
>     Rattlesnake Enterprises             http://www.rattlesnake.com

Jon Cast