From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jon Cast Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: No calc in pretest? Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 15:12:29 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200207022012.g62KCTK19163@d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025643763 22631 127.0.0.1 (2 Jul 2002 21:02:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 21:02:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Miles Bader , Eli Zaretskii , storm@cua.dk, Emacs Devel Mailing List Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17PUnL-0005su-00 for ; Tue, 02 Jul 2002 23:02:43 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17PUsX-0004sy-00 for ; Tue, 02 Jul 2002 23:08:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17PU3p-0001si-00; Tue, 02 Jul 2002 16:15:41 -0400 Original-Received: from d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu ([129.15.78.125]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17PU0w-0001Vm-00; Tue, 02 Jul 2002 16:12:42 -0400 Original-Received: from ou.edu (jcast@localhost) by d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g62KCTK19163; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 15:12:29 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu: jcast owned process doing -bs Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-Reply-To: Message from Stefan Monnier of "Tue, 02 Jul 2002 12:38:00 EDT." <200207021638.g62Gc0e18707@rum.cs.yale.edu> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5369 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5369 Stefan Monnier wrote: > The proposition was *instead* of minor-minor version numbers. > I.e. just make the MM part of NN.MM be a bugfix-release-number and > whenever a release is not bugfix only, then bump up the NN. But your argument about :version has no bearing on whether to use minor-minor version numbers. > Stefan Jon Cast