From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: No calc in pretest?
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 12:05:07 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200207021605.g62G57g18095@rum.cs.yale.edu>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020702130518.10155A-100000@is> <200207021528.g62FSST17855@rum.cs.yale.edu>  <87d6u6uno9.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025625953 10938 127.0.0.1 (2 Jul 2002 16:05:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 16:05:53 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: "Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu>,
   Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>, storm@cua.dk,
   Emacs Devel Mailing List <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17PQA5-0002qJ-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Tue, 02 Jul 2002 18:05:53 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17PQFB-0006Qg-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Tue, 02 Jul 2002 18:11:09 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17PQAF-0004Pi-00; Tue, 02 Jul 2002 12:06:03 -0400
Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17PQ9M-0004NB-00; Tue, 02 Jul 2002 12:05:08 -0400
Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost)
	by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g62G57g18095;
	Tue, 2 Jul 2002 12:05:07 -0400
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4
Original-To: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5328
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5328

> > If it's more convenient to name the current trunk 22.0, then I think it
> > should be done.
> No one has presented a good reason why it would be more convenient either.

I don't necessarily claim that the :version problem in defcustom
and in make-obsolete is "a good reason", but I think it is an annoyance.
I'd much rather fix that annoyance than stick to some vague notion
of "significant change".


	Stefan