From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Lowercase text after full stop on describe-variable Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 08:41:46 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <20020628084129.4C84.LEKTU@terra.es> References: <20020627174057.35D7.LEKTU@terra.es> <1025205260.13408.8.camel@meta> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025246568 23369 127.0.0.1 (28 Jun 2002 06:42:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 06:42:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17NpSy-00064h-00 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 08:42:48 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17NpVv-0006Lu-00 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 08:45:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17NpSu-0007d7-00; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 02:42:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.22.27.141] (helo=mail.peoplecall.com) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17NpS5-0007XC-00 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 02:41:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.22.27.143] (jbarranquero.ofi.peoplecall.com [62.22.27.143]) by mail.peoplecall.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5S6fia29806; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 08:41:45 +0200 Original-To: Colin Walters In-Reply-To: <1025205260.13408.8.camel@meta> X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.05 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5242 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5242 On 27 Jun 2002 15:14:20 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > There was no sane way to support both it and font-lock, and I doubt most > users had changed it from its default value anyways. Ok, now I understand. Thanks, /L/e/k/t/u