From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Patch for Emacs X focus issue Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 13:10:12 -0600 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200206251910.g5PJACn02146@Rednose.Rhubarb> References: <200206242113.g5OLDguO005787@stubby.bodenonline.com> Reply-To: dajo@a-vip.com NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025032176 6798 127.0.0.1 (25 Jun 2002 19:09:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 19:09:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17Mvh2-0001lX-00 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 21:09:36 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17Mvin-0001KM-00 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 21:11:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17Mvgm-0004Ue-00; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 15:09:20 -0400 Original-Received: from dajo.ppp.frii.com ([216.17.133.250] helo=Rednose.Rhubarb) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17Mve9-0004Pq-00; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 15:06:38 -0400 Original-Received: (from dajo@localhost) by Rednose.Rhubarb (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g5PJACn02146; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 13:10:12 -0600 Original-To: jan.h.d@swipnet.se In-Reply-To: <200206242113.g5OLDguO005787@stubby.bodenonline.com> (jan.h.d@swipnet.se) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5200 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5200 > It would be great if the original poster of the input-pending-p > problem could retest with this patch to see if the problem remains. > Is that possible? (Cc:ing the reporter of that bug). I am willing to test if that will help. dajo