From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stefan Monnier" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: local-after-save-hook? Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 18:23:25 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200206232223.g5NMNPh31952@rum.cs.yale.edu> References: <200206212020.g5LKKBM13077@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200206222251.g5MMpER23017@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1024871055 16383 127.0.0.1 (23 Jun 2002 22:24:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 22:24:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, sds@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17MFmJ-0004G8-00 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 00:24:15 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17MFnA-00082m-00 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 00:25:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17MFmF-0006T1-00; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 18:24:11 -0400 Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17MFlW-0006QS-00; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 18:23:26 -0400 Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost) by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g5NMNPh31952; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 18:23:25 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Original-To: Richard Stallman Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5135 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5135 > PS: I have a patch to rename those *-file-*-hooks to *-file-*-hook or > *-file-*-function to better follow the naming convention. Now that > we have defvaralias, we can do this switch with 100% backward > compatibility. Any interest ? > > That seems like a good idea. Please do it. Done. Stefan