From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Invoke Ange-FTP from within Tramp Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 12:12:39 -0600 (MDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200206231812.g5NICd724440@aztec.santafe.edu> References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1024856133 28978 127.0.0.1 (23 Jun 2002 18:15:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 18:15:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17MBtc-0007XH-00 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 20:15:32 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17MBuO-0002SP-00 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 20:16:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17MBtk-0006MS-00; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 14:15:40 -0400 Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17MBqq-0006AB-00; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 14:12:40 -0400 Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49]) by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5NICgC28487; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 12:12:42 -0600 (MDT) Original-Received: (from rms@localhost) by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g5NICd724440; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 12:12:39 -0600 (MDT) X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f Original-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5118 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5118 If you are programming the nonlocal control transfer, it is better to use catch and throw, rather than errors. (See the Emacs Lisp Manual.) Since I have not studied the code, I don't have an opinion about the third alternative.