From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [jidanni@deadspam.com: modeline doesn't divulge buffer will go bye bye]
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 12:12:38 -0600 (MDT)
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200206231812.g5NICcY24437@aztec.santafe.edu>
References: <200206201435.g5KEZLF18772@aztec.santafe.edu> <m17L4HU-000Ij6C@localhost> <5xu1nxh6o7.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk>  <m17LVA1-000Ij5C@localhost> <200206221720.g5MHKLj16237@rum.cs.yale.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1024856135 28986 127.0.0.1 (23 Jun 2002 18:15:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 18:15:35 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: bob@rattlesnake.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17MBtf-0007XP-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 20:15:35 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17MBuR-0002SR-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 20:16:23 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17MBtb-0006Ls-00; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 14:15:31 -0400
Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17MBqp-00069z-00; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 14:12:39 -0400
Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49])
	by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5NICeC28480;
	Sun, 23 Jun 2002 12:12:40 -0600 (MDT)
Original-Received: (from rms@localhost)
	by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g5NICcY24437;
	Sun, 23 Jun 2002 12:12:38 -0600 (MDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f
Original-To: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu
In-Reply-To: <200206221720.g5MHKLj16237@rum.cs.yale.edu>
	(monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5119
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5119

    So maybe we could try to mark those buffers by appending
    something like "[not saved]" on the mode line.

"[not saved]" would give people the wrong idea; "(no file)" might be
clearer.