From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Current Tramp plans Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 16:51:17 -0600 (MDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200206222251.g5MMpHC23023@aztec.santafe.edu> References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1024786466 19397 127.0.0.1 (22 Jun 2002 22:54:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 22:54:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17Ltly-00052d-00 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 00:54:26 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17LtmM-0000CB-00 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 00:54:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17Ltm2-0004u0-00; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 18:54:30 -0400 Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17Ltiw-0004kD-00; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 18:51:18 -0400 Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49]) by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5MMpHC14739; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 16:51:17 -0600 (MDT) Original-Received: (from rms@localhost) by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g5MMpHC23023; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 16:51:17 -0600 (MDT) X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f Original-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5104 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5104 I would like to proceed in a step-by-step fashion: That seems good. Miles (?) /user@host#method:file numeric methods would be considered ports for ftp /method#user@host:file because `#' is already used by Ange-FTP as a special character Either of these seems good to me. I have no preference between them.