From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stefan Monnier" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: how to find out methods for tramp? Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 11:52:03 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200206191552.g5JFq4b02324@rum.cs.yale.edu> References: <200206190223.g5J2NZ915936@aztec.santafe.edu> <200206191512.g5JFC9402106@rum.cs.yale.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1024502053 22668 127.0.0.1 (19 Jun 2002 15:54:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 15:54:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17Khme-0005tP-00 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 17:54:12 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17KiDu-0002ch-00 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 18:22:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17Khmd-0001pN-00; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 11:54:11 -0400 Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17Khkc-00012D-00 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 11:52:06 -0400 Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost) by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g5JFq4b02324; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 11:52:04 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Original-To: "Robert J. Chassell" Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4995 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4995 > I think the use of a capital together with the particular grammatical > construct used makes it clear that this use of the word `windows' > refers to a proper name rather than to the general concept of a window. > I'm surprised that anybody would be confused. > > I get confused because many of the people I know refer to `X Windows' > and shorten that phrase to `Windows'. Hmm...interesting. I've always heard it shortened to `X' which is indeed shorter than `Windows'. But at least now I understand your confusion, thanks. Stefan