From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: comint doesn't like read-only prompts Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 10:43:36 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <20020614100209.D4C5.LEKTU@terra.es> References: <20020613103231.CD52.LEKTU@terra.es> <200206132147.g5DLl8r07587@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1024044469 24796 127.0.0.1 (14 Jun 2002 08:47:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 08:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17ImkH-0006Rp-00 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 10:47:49 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17In8y-0006P7-00 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:13:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17Imhi-00065N-00; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 04:45:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.22.27.141] (helo=mail.peoplecall.com) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17ImgE-0005i2-00; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 04:43:38 -0400 Original-Received: from jbarranquero (jbarranquero.ofi.peoplecall.com [62.22.27.143]) by mail.peoplecall.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5E8ha414117; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 10:43:36 +0200 Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <200206132147.g5DLl8r07587@aztec.santafe.edu> X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.00.11 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4854 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4854 On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 15:47:08 -0600 (MDT), Richard Stallman wrote: > It is possible that some other change is the right patch--I don't know. > But it is clear that this patch is reasonable. Miles has already proposed a better fix. /L/e/k/t/u