From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question. Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 12:23:37 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <20020613121400.E9FB.LEKTU@terra.es> References: <20020612142053.C614.LEKTU@terra.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1023963902 799 127.0.0.1 (13 Jun 2002 10:25:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 10:25:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Rob Browning , emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17IRmn-0000Cm-00 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 12:25:01 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17ISB2-0001MJ-00 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 12:50:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17IRmF-0006iM-00; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 06:24:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.22.27.141] (helo=mail.peoplecall.com) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17IRlb-0006dt-00 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 06:23:47 -0400 Original-Received: from jbarranquero (jbarranquero.ofi.peoplecall.com [62.22.27.143]) by mail.peoplecall.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5DANbU04253; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 12:23:37 +0200 Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.00.11 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4825 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4825 On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 08:21:17 +0300 (IDT), Eli Zaretskii wrote: > That is, what modules are present in the list submitted to make-docfile on each > platform, and which explain these differences? See the list below. > the question is whether all platforms should have the doc strings of those. That seems like a good idea, but it'll pose a maintenance burden, I think. > Then there are some x-* symbols which I thought should be in all > versions. All x-files have a corresponding w32-file, but I suppose they don't always define the exact same symbols. > And then there are some symbols like ucs-* and others which should have > been in DOC on all systems--can you see why they aren't? Don't know why the relevant files (like lisp/international/ucs-tables) aren't included. An oversight, perhaps? /L/e/k/t/u --- redhat.lst Thu Jun 13 11:49:53 2002 +++ windows.lst Thu Jun 13 11:49:40 2002 -src/atimer +src/alloca -src/composite -src/dosfns +src/gmalloc +src/lastfile -src/mac -src/macfns -src/macmenu -src/macterm -src/md5 -src/msdos +src/ralloc -src/sound -src/sunfns +src/termcap +src/tparam -src/unexelf +src/unexw32 +src/vm-limit +src/w32 +src/w32console +src/w32fns +src/w32heap +src/w32inevt +src/w32menu +src/w32proc +src/w32reg +src/w32select +src/w32term +src/w32xfns -src/xfns -src/xmenu -src/xrdb -src/xselect -src/xsmfns -src/xterm -lisp/font-core -lisp/international/ucs-tables +lisp/w32-vars