From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: comint doesn't like read-only prompts Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 11:04:30 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <20020613110134.CD56.LEKTU@terra.es> References: <20020613103231.CD52.LEKTU@terra.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1023959206 24906 127.0.0.1 (13 Jun 2002 09:06:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 09:06:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17IQZ4-0006Tb-00 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 11:06:46 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17IQxH-00086B-00 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 11:31:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17IQYk-0004j6-00; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 05:06:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.22.27.141] (helo=mail.peoplecall.com) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17IQWu-0004a0-00; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 05:04:32 -0400 Original-Received: from jbarranquero (jbarranquero.ofi.peoplecall.com [62.22.27.143]) by mail.peoplecall.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5D94UU03399; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 11:04:30 +0200 Original-To: Miles Bader In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.00.11 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4821 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4821 On 13 Jun 2002 17:51:21 +0900, Miles Bader wrote: > I guess that patch would work, but somehow ielm's calling comint's > output filter on read-only text seems vaguely dodgy to me. Yeah, I don't like it either, but having IELM prompt (and many others, I suppose) read-only is very useful. I was always doing horrible things to it by accident... :) > Perhaps it would be better to make comint itself support read-only > prompts, controlled with a variable; then ielm could just set that > variable to t. That would be a useful feature that people could turn > on for other comint modes as well if they want. I like it. But I'm no expert in comint so I have no idea how to implement that. /L/e/k/t/u