From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Please pretest Emacs 21.3 Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 09:24:20 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <20020613092222.CD49.LEKTU@terra.es> References: <20020613083730.CD43.LEKTU@terra.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1023953289 15056 127.0.0.1 (13 Jun 2002 07:28:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 07:28:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Jason Rumney , emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17IP1d-0003uj-00 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 09:28:09 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17IPPo-0005wE-00 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 09:53:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17IP0d-00049O-00; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 03:27:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.22.27.141] (helo=mail.peoplecall.com) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17IOxx-00043B-00; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 03:24:21 -0400 Original-Received: from jbarranquero (jbarranquero.ofi.peoplecall.com [62.22.27.143]) by mail.peoplecall.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5D7OKU02348; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 09:24:20 +0200 Original-To: Juanma Barranquero In-Reply-To: <20020613083730.CD43.LEKTU@terra.es> X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.00.11 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4817 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4817 On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 08:51:05 +0200, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > I'm including a .jpg image of what I get. BTW, the .jpg is from a 21.3.50, but the same happens with 21.2 and 21.2.90. /L/e/k/t/u