From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/emacs@RUM.cs.yale.edu>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question.
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 15:52:17 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200206101952.g5AJqHO29665@rum.cs.yale.edu>
References: <87u1oo6xhm.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <8962-Fri31May2002214124+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <87elfs6spr.fsf@wesley.springies.com> <7999-Sat01Jun2002102420+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <878z5zvtlf.fsf@wesley.springies.com> <7680-Sat01Jun2002195058+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <87wut79cb7.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org>  <87r8jeapfk.fsf@wesley.springies.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1023738877 6825 127.0.0.1 (10 Jun 2002 19:54:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 19:54:37 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>,
   emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17HVFN-0001ly-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 21:54:37 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17HVcL-0000r0-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 22:18:22 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17HVEt-00017k-00; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 15:54:07 -0400
Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17HVD9-0000xd-00
	for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 15:52:19 -0400
Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost)
	by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g5AJqHO29665;
	Mon, 10 Jun 2002 15:52:17 -0400
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4
Original-To: Alan Shutko <ats@acm.org>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4718
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4718

> Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org> writes:
> 
> > What about the above comment, though?  If the DOC issue is a bug, I'd
> > be happy to see if I can fix it.  I'd rather spend the time on that
> > than on some less appropriate hack.
> 
> The DOC files do differ between compiles.  If you ./configure and then
> ./configure --without-x, you'll see a .1 and a .2.  Emacs will
> normally use those correctly.  (The files do differ... try diffing or

Please show us the diff, since any difference is a bug.
There've been reports of such bugs in the past and they're pretty easy
to fix.  I don't know of any outstanding such problem, but that's no
guarantee.


	Stefan