From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Assignment of misc packages for emacs Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 17:23:33 -0600 (MDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200206072323.g57NNXU27361@aztec.santafe.edu> References: <200205050534.g455YfF01634@aztec.santafe.edu> <5xbsbumexh.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200205141941.g4EJfud15293@aztec.santafe.edu> <5xvg9qmgzt.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200205151927.g4FJRRW26103@rum.cs.yale.edu> <5x3cwr4q7m.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <87g00rd74y.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> <87sn4otknt.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> <200205191441.g4JEfMg23080@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200205202134.g4KLYHj26031@aztec.santafe.edu> <200205222227.g4MMRIX29393@aztec.santafe.edu> <87g0030xah.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> <200206061204.g56C4qf24692@aztec.santafe.edu> <87r8jka8bm.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1023494005 28106 127.0.0.1 (7 Jun 2002 23:53:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 23:53:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@RUM.cs.yale.edu, storm@cua.dk, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17GTXp-0007JD-00 for ; Sat, 08 Jun 2002 01:53:25 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17GTtR-0000pL-00 for ; Sat, 08 Jun 2002 02:15:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17GT5s-0007fP-00; Fri, 07 Jun 2002 19:24:32 -0400 Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17GT4x-0007Sr-00; Fri, 07 Jun 2002 19:23:35 -0400 Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49]) by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g57NNYQ21593; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 17:23:34 -0600 (MDT) Original-Received: (from rms@localhost) by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g57NNXU27361; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 17:23:33 -0600 (MDT) X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f Original-To: miles@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87r8jka8bm.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> (message from Miles Bader on 06 Jun 2002 21:41:01 +0900) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4642 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4642 It could be, but it seemed nice to have the format sent to lisp be something simple and well defined -- raw keymaps are pretty complicated, and the details tend to change over time. The code to understand the menu items has to be somewhere; I don't see any reason why it should not be in Lisp. After all, there is Lisp code to create menu items. Meanwhile, this creates another ad-hoc representation for the same data. If we extend the capabilities of menus, might we have to make an incompatible change in this representation?