From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: emacs misbehaves without --unibyte
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 01:04:56 -0600 (MDT)
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200205310704.g4V74uG14577@aztec.santafe.edu>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020529130511.1847B-100000@is> <m17D3EZ-000IhJC@localhost> <4331-Wed29May2002200233+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1022828797 15172 127.0.0.1 (31 May 2002 07:06:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 07:06:37 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: bob@rattlesnake.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17DgUf-0003wa-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Fri, 31 May 2002 09:06:37 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17Dgnp-0002bj-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Fri, 31 May 2002 09:26:25 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17DgVJ-0004jw-00; Fri, 31 May 2002 03:07:17 -0400
Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17DgT3-0004Tn-00; Fri, 31 May 2002 03:04:57 -0400
Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49])
	by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g4V74uV23885;
	Fri, 31 May 2002 01:04:56 -0600 (MDT)
Original-Received: (from rms@localhost)
	by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g4V74uG14577;
	Fri, 31 May 2002 01:04:56 -0600 (MDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f
Original-To: eliz@is.elta.co.il
In-Reply-To: <4331-Wed29May2002200233+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4522
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4522

    > What would be a good value to provide `default-file-name-coding-system'?

    I thought no-conversion would be good, but it sounds like it isn't.

I think it is vital to investigate why isn't no-conversion a good
choice.  Maybe there is a bug here.  Fixing it may be the best
solution.