From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: CUA mode cursor color
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 01:00:33 -0600 (MDT)
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200205150700.g4F70XB16116@aztec.santafe.edu>
References: <buooffk4zjw.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
	<buok7q84yo1.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
	<200205131700.g4DH0E413260@aztec.santafe.edu> <87u1pbhage.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1021446184 29908 127.0.0.1 (15 May 2002 07:03:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 07:03:04 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 177soS-0007mH-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Wed, 15 May 2002 09:03:04 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 177szr-0004VW-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Wed, 15 May 2002 09:14:51 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 177sog-0006Ny-00; Wed, 15 May 2002 03:03:18 -0400
Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 177sm2-0006A1-00; Wed, 15 May 2002 03:00:34 -0400
Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49])
	by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g4F70Xk18923;
	Wed, 15 May 2002 01:00:33 -0600 (MDT)
Original-Received: (from rms@localhost)
	by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g4F70XB16116;
	Wed, 15 May 2002 01:00:33 -0600 (MDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f
Original-To: miles@gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <87u1pbhage.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> (message from Miles
	Bader on 14 May 2002 08:52:49 +0900)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3951
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3951

    This only fails in the most bizarre of cases; for instance:
    if t-m-m is disabled, and the user turns on cua-mode, and then turns off
    t-m-m and then turns t-m-m back on, and somehow expects it to then
    `stick' if he subsequently turns off cua-mode.  This seems like a very
    unlikely scenario.

What if t-m-m was enabled, and the user enables cua-mode, disables
t-m-m, then disables cua-mode?  Should that reenable t-m-m?

Is the suggestion that cua-mode would only disable t-m-m, never
reenable it?  I guess that is safe enough.