From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Listing process status in buffer list Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 13:42:03 -0600 (MDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200205141942.g4EJg3H15308@aztec.santafe.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1021408038 5985 127.0.0.1 (14 May 2002 20:27:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 20:27:18 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 177itC-0001YQ-00 for ; Tue, 14 May 2002 22:27:18 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 177j4O-0006yN-00 for ; Tue, 14 May 2002 22:38:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 177iEs-0003V6-00; Tue, 14 May 2002 15:45:38 -0400 Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 177iBS-00028o-00; Tue, 14 May 2002 15:42:06 -0400 Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49]) by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g4EJg3k00126; Tue, 14 May 2002 13:42:03 -0600 (MDT) Original-Received: (from rms@localhost) by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g4EJg3H15308; Tue, 14 May 2002 13:42:03 -0600 (MDT) X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3938 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3938 By the way, in various buffer lists .* *compilation* 58 Compilation should also mention if its process is running or not, I suppose along with shell window listings, etc. That is a good idea, and would not be hard to implement if list-buffers is taught to look in some new buffer-local variable for some extra text to put at the end of the line. Would someone like to do it?