From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: kill ring menu Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 23:34:04 -0600 (MDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200205050534.g455Y4201553@aztec.santafe.edu> References: <1020022891.27106.142.camel@space-ghost> <200204290505.g3T55t006146@aztec.santafe.edu> <1020059236.31789.358.camel@space-ghost> <200204300519.g3U5Js306727@aztec.santafe.edu> <1020212569.27106.2246.camel@space-ghost> <200205011926.g41JQBC07690@aztec.santafe.edu> <1020284783.27106.3417.camel@space-ghost> <200205031825.g43IPrt00762@aztec.santafe.edu> <87u1pp9hma.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> <200205040336.g443aZi00988@aztec.santafe.edu> <877kmka7x7.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020577282 15200 127.0.0.1 (5 May 2002 05:41:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 05:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: walters@debian.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 174Elu-0003x3-00 for ; Sun, 05 May 2002 07:41:22 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 174EsQ-0006dE-00 for ; Sun, 05 May 2002 07:48:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 174Egn-0005oC-00; Sun, 05 May 2002 01:36:05 -0400 Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 174Ees-0005aq-00; Sun, 05 May 2002 01:34:06 -0400 Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49]) by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g455Y4k18323; Sat, 4 May 2002 23:34:05 -0600 (MDT) Original-Received: (from rms@localhost) by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g455Y4201553; Sat, 4 May 2002 23:34:04 -0600 (MDT) X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f Original-To: miles@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <877kmka7x7.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> (message from Miles Bader on 04 May 2002 12:49:56 +0900) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3592 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3592 Ah -- I use transient-mark-mode, which makes the dynamics of such things different. I think with TMM active, it would be useful behavior, but I can see that it would probably suck if TMM wasn't active... Would this make sense as `transient-mark-mode only' behavior? I don't think it makes sense for M-y to be THAT different in Transient Mark mode. It would be much better to use a different interface, one that would be ok to use in both modes. Perhaps C-u M-y should do one of these features.