From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 15:19:54 -0600 (MDT)
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200204302119.g3ULJs306912@aztec.santafe.edu>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020429074608.22112B-100000@is> <200204291840.g3TIe7306365@aztec.santafe.edu> <9743-Mon29Apr2002221339+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020229122 12500 127.0.0.1 (1 May 2002 04:58:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 04:58:42 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: gildea@stop.mail-abuse.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, akochoi@shaw.ca
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 172mCQ-0003FV-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Wed, 01 May 2002 06:58:42 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 172mH0-00012L-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Wed, 01 May 2002 07:03:26 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 172mCB-0003XF-00; Wed, 01 May 2002 00:58:27 -0400
Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 172f2S-0006U2-00; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 17:19:56 -0400
Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49])
	by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g3ULJsk03019;
	Tue, 30 Apr 2002 15:19:54 -0600 (MDT)
Original-Received: (from rms@localhost)
	by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g3ULJs306912;
	Tue, 30 Apr 2002 15:19:54 -0600 (MDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f
Original-To: eliz@is.elta.co.il
In-Reply-To: <9743-Mon29Apr2002221339+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3466
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3466

      In the absence of significant
    advantages, I think the defaults should not change.

We have already seen a significant advantage, in the case
that brought up this decision.  That is enough reason for the change
if there is no concrete reason on the other side.