From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: minibuffer vs dialog-boxes
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 14:02:09 -0600 (MDT)
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200204212002.g3LK29a01683@aztec.santafe.edu>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020418192257.8613H-100000@is> <m3vgamojj7.fsf@Janik.cz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019419418 16897 127.0.0.1 (21 Apr 2002 20:03:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 20:03:38 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: eliz@is.elta.co.il, monnier+gnu/emacs@RUM.cs.yale.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 16zNYf-0004OQ-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 22:03:37 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 16zNZ2-00078r-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 22:04:00 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16zNYO-0003cS-00; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 16:03:20 -0400
Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16zNXH-0003We-00; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 16:02:11 -0400
Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49])
	by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g3LK29a20052;
	Sun, 21 Apr 2002 14:02:09 -0600 (MDT)
Original-Received: (from rms@localhost)
	by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g3LK29a01683;
	Sun, 21 Apr 2002 14:02:09 -0600 (MDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f
Original-To: Pavel@Janik.cz
In-Reply-To: <m3vgamojj7.fsf@Janik.cz> (Pavel@Janik.cz)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2958
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2958

    Some days ago I proposed changing the background color of the whole
    minibuffer.

Do you mean changing the background of the whole empty line?
That might be rather strong.  But we could show it to some
users and see what they think of it.