From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stefan Monnier" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:18:19 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200204181018.g3IAIJX00462@rum.cs.yale.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019125268 1041 127.0.0.1 (18 Apr 2002 10:21:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 10:21:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Richard Stallman , ulrich@a0.complang.tuwien.ac.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16y92K-0000Gg-00 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 12:21:08 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16y9LS-0005Uz-00 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 12:40:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16y92M-00079d-00; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:21:10 -0400 Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16y8ze-0006yq-00; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:18:22 -0400 Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost) by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g3IAIJX00462; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:18:19 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Original-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2719 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2719 > > On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Richard Stallman wrote: > > > I see two possible solutions: > > > > - hardcode a few more special characters, like ISO8859-x NBSP and a > > few Unicode characters; > > > > For now, I think we should do it that way. > > Perhaps the char-table implementation suggested by Handa-san is better. > It is certainly easier to customize by users, so it's more flexible. I think using fundamental-mode's syntax-table (i.e. the standard syntax-table) is the best choice. Stefan