From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stefan Monnier" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: user sees \xxx but is thwarted from searching for them Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 13:04:11 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200204171704.g3HH4BP29190@rum.cs.yale.edu> References: <563-Tue16Apr2002170838+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <200204171604.g3HG4ob24867@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019063171 13521 127.0.0.1 (17 Apr 2002 17:06:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 17:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Heinrich.Rommerskirchen@icn.siemen.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16xssl-0003Vy-00 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 19:06:11 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16xtBX-0007al-00 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 19:25:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16xssi-0004QE-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 13:06:08 -0400 Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16xsqq-0004Hk-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 13:04:12 -0400 Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost) by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g3HH4BP29190; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 13:04:11 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Original-To: Richard Stallman Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2709 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2709 > I was in such a situation yesterday. Normally I use latin-1 encoding but > switched to language environment latin-9 to edit some files containing Euro > signs and forgot about this change. Then I loaded a 400 line DOS file > containing "-*- coding: cp850 -*-" in the first line. Emacs encoded all the > umlauts already in the file as latin-1 but encoded the typed umlauts as > latin-9. And after minor changes all over the file and a few interruptions > I didn't remember which parts were changed and which were old ... > > Does anyone have an idea for what we should do about this? > Does the change to turn on unify-on-encoding fix this automatically? It does fix the above case, yes. > Will the switch to native Unicode fix it? It will also fix it. Stefan