From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Bug#142608: emacs21: please apply flyspell patch from preview-latex package
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 10:04:53 -0600 (MDT)
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200204171604.g3HG4ru24873@aztec.santafe.edu>
References: <E16wEb6-0005Op-00@volition>
	<871ydiq5ju.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org>
	<x57kna8th5.fsf@tupik.goethe.zz>
	<200204152200.g3FM06K23791@aztec.santafe.edu> <x51ydgk3i6.fsf@tupik.goethe.zz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019059610 5831 127.0.0.1 (17 Apr 2002 16:06:50 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 16:06:50 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 16xrxK-0001Vw-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 18:06:50 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 16xsG5-0006Dm-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 18:26:13 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16xrxL-0004ir-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 12:06:51 -0400
Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16xrvS-0004UR-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 12:04:54 -0400
Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49])
	by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g3HG4ra00301;
	Wed, 17 Apr 2002 10:04:53 -0600 (MDT)
Original-Received: (from rms@localhost)
	by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g3HG4ru24873;
	Wed, 17 Apr 2002 10:04:53 -0600 (MDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f
Original-To: David.Kastrup@t-online.de
In-Reply-To: <x51ydgk3i6.fsf@tupik.goethe.zz> (David.Kastrup@t-online.de)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2707
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2707

    fixed for perhaps half a year now (and still has), I would really be
    surprised if the fixes (or their supersession by larger changes taking
    them into account) would not already be present in RC.

Mere passage of time does not put anything into RC.
(How could it?)  That happens only under human control.
That is why I suggested you put these into RC.

      IIRC, 21.3 was
    not supposed to be mere bug fixes as compared to 21.2, was it?

We have decided to base 21.3 on RC.  The release from HEAD
will be 21.4.

    I would first have to get developer access to GNU Emacs, I am
    registered as "dak" at Savannah and have signed all the necessary
    papers.

Eli, can you do that?