From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stefan Monnier" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: recursive load case in openp Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 00:03:32 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200204120403.g3C43WR07781@rum.cs.yale.edu> References: <200204102343.IAA06716@etlken.m17n.org> <200204111301.g3BD1VI30043@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200204120313.g3C3D4v22341@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1018584375 14594 127.0.0.1 (12 Apr 2002 04:06:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 04:06:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, handa@etl.go.jp, eliz@is.elta.co.il, walters@debian.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16vsKF-0003nH-00 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 06:06:15 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16vsaL-00044c-00 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 06:22:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16vsK6-0005ap-00; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 00:06:06 -0400 Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16vsHd-0005Fo-00; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 00:03:33 -0400 Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost) by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g3C43WR07781; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 00:03:32 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Original-To: Richard Stallman Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2565 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2565 > Of course, in the mean time we should just create > temp_buffer_setup and have temp_output_buffer_setup call it. > The actual code needed in coding.c was too small to be worth > such a subroutine. I will fix fileio.c also. I disagree with your assessment of the various costs involved. I find the cost of maintaining such duplicated code much higher than the potential CPU and memory cost of a few spills. Stefan