From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stefan Monnier" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: etags confused with uppercase filenames (on Windows) Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 10:22:17 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200204031522.g33FMHE11108@rum.cs.yale.edu> References: <200204021602.g32G2oS02957@rum.cs.yale.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1017847461 21612 127.0.0.1 (3 Apr 2002 15:24:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 15:24:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, pot@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, stavros.macrakis@verizon.net Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16smcX-0005cM-00 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2002 17:24:21 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16smog-0004DI-00 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2002 17:36:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16smcJ-0007Kk-00; Wed, 03 Apr 2002 10:24:07 -0500 Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16smaY-0007Bb-00; Wed, 03 Apr 2002 10:22:18 -0500 Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost) by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g33FMHE11108; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 10:22:17 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Original-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2349 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2349 > > From: "Stefan Monnier" > > Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 11:02:49 -0500 > > > > But I do think that #! should take precedence since I'd rather > > not change the existing behavior on POSIX systems. > > Does it really make sense to have etags behavior be different on > different platforms? Especially given the fact that some file you are > working on can well come from a Windows system that exports its > filesystem? I didn't say the behavior should be different. Just that the current behavior works fine on the free systems that we care about, so we should make this change lower down the precedence rather than higher up, unless we think it's also a desirable (rather than just harmless) change for the case-sensitive systems, of course. Stefan