From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stefan Monnier" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Character problems Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 18:25:07 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200203262325.g2QNP7w19070@rum.cs.yale.edu> References: <200203241902.g2OJ22324648@emr.cs.iit.edu> <200203251202.g2PC28R03163@aztec.santafe.edu> <200203262318.g2QNIu508298@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1017185242 8944 127.0.0.1 (26 Mar 2002 23:27:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 23:27:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: schwab@suse.de, reingold@emr.cs.iit.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16q0La-0002K9-00 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2002 00:27:22 +0100 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16q0UH-0000Ju-00 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2002 00:36:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16q0LR-00080C-00; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 18:27:13 -0500 Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16q0JQ-0007vv-00; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 18:25:08 -0500 Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost) by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g2QNP7w19070; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 18:25:07 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Original-To: Richard Stallman Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2222 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2222 > I do not see \201 anywhere, that must be a problem on your side. The raw > mail as I received it does not contain any \201 characters. > > The 201's were visible in my buffer when I received that message. But > perhaps neither of us can tell for certain what was in the file he > sent, because of the encoding and decoding that goes on. The only way > we can really be sure is if Reingold saves that region using emacs-mule > encoding, uuencodes the file, and sends that. I'm pretty sure it wasn't in the email I received since it did not get near any kind of Emacs process on its way from the network to my screen and yet there were no \201 chars to be seen. Stefan "who still hasn't switched to an Emacs-based MUA" _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel