From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stefan Monnier" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Unify on encoding Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 16:12:00 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200203192112.g2JLC0408336@rum.cs.yale.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016572546 2708 127.0.0.1 (19 Mar 2002 21:15:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 21:15:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Richard Stallman , monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16nQxO-0000ha-00 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 22:15:46 +0100 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16nR2p-0001YY-00 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 22:21:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16nQwt-0005LG-00; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 16:15:15 -0500 Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16nQtl-00059o-00; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 16:12:01 -0500 Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost) by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g2JLC0408336; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 16:12:00 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Original-To: Jason Rumney Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2048 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2048 > > I only objected to the latter part, because doing so would change an > > important characteristic of the default operation without leaving an > > escape route for users who don't want the new default. > > The escape route would be to select an iso2022 or emacs-mule coding > system from the expanded list offered. Or do those get unified as well? I believe you're confusing the current issue (unify-on-encoding) which has no known negative side-effect with the problem discussed a few weeks/months back that occurs due to unify-on-decoding. Stefan _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel