From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stefan Monnier" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Unify on encoding Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 09:33:17 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200203181433.g2IEXH128844@rum.cs.yale.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016462196 9962 127.0.0.1 (18 Mar 2002 14:36:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 14:36:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16myFX-0002aa-00 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 15:36:35 +0100 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16myKU-0001GN-00 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 15:41:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16myF8-0002er-00; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 09:36:10 -0500 Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16myCP-0002UF-00 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 09:33:21 -0500 Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost) by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g2IEXH128844; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 09:33:17 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Original-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2005 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2005 > On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > A second request (but separate) is whether there is any objection to removing > > the ability to turn off unify-8859-on-encoding-mode. > FWIW, I object in principle to removing user options, especially for > brand-new features we never tested in a public release. I think we > should revisit this specific issue after Emacs 21.3 is released and > used for a while, based on user reports. Since this user option has not been introduced in any release yet, I fail to see why this would be considered as "removing user option". Instead I think it's a mistake to introduce this new user option since there's no reason to ever turn off the feature. Stefan _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel