From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should invisible imply intangible? Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 19:30:17 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <200203070230.g272UHC02099@wijiji.santafe.edu> References: <200202232019.g1NKJoG14638@aztec.santafe.edu> <200202250510.g1P5A3714156@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200202262013.g1QKDef16683@aztec.santafe.edu> <200203010130.g211UDG05790@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200203031440.g23EeN200619@aztec.santafe.edu> <200203031711.g23HBI623254@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200203042341.g24Nffq00590@aztec.santafe.edu> <200203050140.g251em831456@rum.cs.yale.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1015468846 18976 195.204.10.66 (7 Mar 2002 02:40:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 7 Mar 2002 02:40:46 GMT Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16inpl-0004vy-00 for ; Thu, 07 Mar 2002 03:40:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16iniX-0000IJ-00; Wed, 06 Mar 2002 21:33:17 -0500 Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16infp-000750-00; Wed, 06 Mar 2002 21:30:29 -0500 Original-Received: from wijiji.santafe.edu (wijiji [192.12.12.5]) by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g272UTu11151; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 19:30:29 -0700 (MST) Original-Received: (from rms@localhost) by wijiji.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id g272UHC02099; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 19:30:17 -0700 (MST) X-Authentication-Warning: wijiji.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@wijiji using -f Original-To: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu In-reply-to: <200203050140.g251em831456@rum.cs.yale.edu> (monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1770 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1770 Maybe I shouldn't be trying so hard ? Since this runs only once when the user types a character, it need not be super efficient. Instead of optimizing this function I suspect it will be a bigger optimization not to call it at all after a self-insert. It seems clear to me that this adjustment is always a no-op after self-insert, and most user input characters are self-inserting. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel