From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Should invisible imply intangible?
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 14:58:07 -0700 (MST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200203052158.g25Lw7A01243@wijiji.santafe.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200203042341.g24NfiH00596@aztec.santafe.edu> (message from Richard Stallman on Mon, 4 Mar 2002 16:41:44 -0700 (MST))
I wrote
The change in adjust_point_for_property seems ok, and it might solve
this problem.
However, subsequently I realized it should be somewhat different. The
buffer position just after the invisible text should be treated as
part of the range where point cannot be. (This is how invisible,
intangible text is handled now.)
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-05 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-23 20:19 Should invisible imply intangible? Richard Stallman
2002-02-23 21:24 ` Paul Michael Reilly
2002-02-25 0:09 ` Richard Stallman
2002-02-25 5:10 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-02-26 20:13 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-01 1:30 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-03-03 14:40 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-03 17:11 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-03-04 23:41 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-04 23:46 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-03-05 1:40 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-03-07 2:30 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-04 23:41 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-05 21:58 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2002-03-05 23:04 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-03-05 23:34 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-03-09 20:03 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-09 22:37 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-03-10 21:32 ` Richard Stallman
[not found] ` <200203102202.g2AM26q06798@rum.cs.yale.edu>
2002-03-11 19:06 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-12 17:56 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-03-13 10:58 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-13 11:19 ` David Kastrup
2002-03-15 3:41 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-15 11:47 ` David Kastrup
2002-03-16 6:39 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-16 11:58 ` David Kastrup
2002-03-18 9:06 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-18 23:36 ` David Kastrup
2002-03-19 7:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-03-19 11:12 ` David Kastrup
2002-03-16 0:22 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-03-16 0:56 ` Miles Bader
2002-03-16 0:59 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-03-16 1:25 ` David Kastrup
2002-03-17 10:06 ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-16 1:18 ` David Kastrup
2002-03-16 1:28 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-03-16 2:16 ` David Kastrup
2002-03-16 3:29 ` Miles Bader
2002-03-16 4:05 ` David Kastrup
2002-03-23 23:37 ` David Kastrup
2002-03-13 13:06 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-03-13 14:15 ` David Kastrup
2002-03-13 16:53 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-03-14 12:42 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200203052158.g25Lw7A01243@wijiji.santafe.edu \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).