From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should invisible imply intangible? Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 07:40:23 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <200203031440.g23EeN200619@aztec.santafe.edu> References: <200202232019.g1NKJoG14638@aztec.santafe.edu> <200202250510.g1P5A3714156@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200202262013.g1QKDef16683@aztec.santafe.edu> <200203010130.g211UDG05790@rum.cs.yale.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1015166884 9969 195.204.10.66 (3 Mar 2002 14:48:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Mar 2002 14:48:04 GMT Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16hXHQ-0002aa-00 for ; Sun, 03 Mar 2002 15:48:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16hXBj-00005p-00; Sun, 03 Mar 2002 09:42:11 -0500 Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16hXA0-0008M4-00; Sun, 03 Mar 2002 09:40:24 -0500 Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49]) by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g23EeVu13881; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 07:40:31 -0700 (MST) Original-Received: (from rms@localhost) by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g23EeN200619; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 07:40:23 -0700 (MST) X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f Original-To: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu In-reply-to: <200203010130.g211UDG05790@rum.cs.yale.edu> (monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1702 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1702 Also, as David Kastrup has mentioned repeatedly, intangible text tends to break lots of things... I don't think so. For example: automatically move point to a visible area after each command (and after post-command-hook, of course) or during redisplay (I believe there is already such a feature for text with a `display' property). If we can find some better way to move point out of certain text than what `intangible' does now, perhaps we should redefine the meaning of `intangible'. But I think it breaks only a few things, occasionally. I think it is pretty good. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel