From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should customizing default-frame-alist change existing frames? Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 12:50:45 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <200203021950.g22Jojl20918@aztec.santafe.edu> References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1015099006 26552 195.204.10.66 (2 Mar 2002 19:56:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 2 Mar 2002 19:56:46 GMT Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, dortmann@lsil.com Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16hFcb-0006u4-00 for ; Sat, 02 Mar 2002 20:56:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16hFXD-0007iM-00; Sat, 02 Mar 2002 14:51:11 -0500 Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16hFWo-0007e0-00; Sat, 02 Mar 2002 14:50:46 -0500 Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49]) by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g22Joru03310; Sat, 2 Mar 2002 12:50:53 -0700 (MST) Original-Received: (from rms@localhost) by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g22Jojl20918; Sat, 2 Mar 2002 12:50:45 -0700 (MST) X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f Original-To: abraham@dina.kvl.dk In-reply-to: (message from Per Abrahamsen on Fri, 01 Mar 2002 09:15:39 +0100) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1690 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1690 RMS asked me to look at this, but did not say what to do. I didn't try to figure out what to do--I hoped you would do that. 1. Change the doc string to say that existing frames will not be affected by setting default-frame-alist, only new ones. I think that is probably best, as the usual action. But there could be another option or button to adjust all existing frames. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel