From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 18:11:10 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <200203010111.g211BA320156@aztec.santafe.edu> References: <20020228092109.6CF5.LEKTU@terra.es> <20020228121951.6D00.LEKTU@terra.es> <5x1yf53hnr.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1014945407 24081 195.204.10.66 (1 Mar 2002 01:16:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 1 Mar 2002 01:16:47 GMT Cc: lektu@terra.es, schwab@suse.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16gbfC-0006GJ-00 for ; Fri, 01 Mar 2002 02:16:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16gbai-0000Nk-00; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 20:12:08 -0500 Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16gbZr-0000Fl-00; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 20:11:15 -0500 Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49]) by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g211BJu16960; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 18:11:19 -0700 (MST) Original-Received: (from rms@localhost) by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g211BA320156; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 18:11:10 -0700 (MST) X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f Original-To: storm@cua.dk In-reply-to: <5x1yf53hnr.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> (storm@cua.dk) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1650 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1650 What about changing the buffer name rather than the mode-line-process, ie. *IELM on test.el* or *IELM on *wide reply to Juanma Barranquero** In case there is more than one IELM buffer pointing at the same long-named buffer, it would be important to uniquify the names in a somewhat special way. The difference between *IELM on *wide reply to Juanma Barranquero** and *IELM on *wide reply to Juanma Barranquero**<2> would not be visible in the mode line. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel